Land & Local
Government: Problem or Potential?(Part
1)
AFRA News No. 59
Jan 2006
Learning from Makhado - Marc Wegerif
A few
years ago Nkuzi Development Association (Nkuzi), a land sector NGO based in
Limpopo Province, started a project called the Area Land Reform Initiative
(ALRI).This project was started with the
specific aim of developing an approach that could meet the challenge of
delivering land at a scale and in a way that realises the development
benefits.The project targets the Makhado
(formerly Louis Trichardt) municipal area in the northern part of the Limpopo
Province.
Key
partners in the project are the Makhado Local Municipality and the Land Reform
Forum that is the local structure of the LPM, comprising over sixty land
claimant communities within the municipal area.This area was chosen for the project due to the working relationship that
Nkuzi already had with the Land Reform Forum, and the municipality.It is also an area with many land needs and
where little progress had been made.
Makhado
Facts & Figures
The area has a population of 490,000.
The land area covered by the municipality is 1,600,000ha.
The municipality is centred around the town of Makhado and
includes “white” farming areas, and parts of the former homelands of Gazankulu
and Venda.
There is no other big industry in the area outside of
agriculture.
Agriculture in the area includes fruit production, forestry,
livestock, maize, and game farming.
The service sector based around government services and
retail shops is a big contributor to the local economy.
Tourism is seen has having potential for the future.
The
strategy which ALRI adopted centred around facilitating landless communities in
the development of a plan for land and agrarian reform.The work of the project first focused on an
area within Makhado Nzhelele.Nzhelele is
part of the former homeland of Venda and is a typical resettlement area of the
apartheid era of forced removals.Later
it was requested by stakeholders that the approach should cover the whole of
Makhado, as it also emerged that land claims by communities in Nzhelele affected
most of the Makhado area.
Consultation and
research
As
there had in the past been no co-ordination between the various structures and
departments involved, support was organised from key stakeholders inside and
outside government.
Consultative
workshops and meetings with individual communities and with the structures of
the Land Reform Forum were used to identify land needs and issues from a
community perspective. These were also a way of promoting a more integrated and
developmental approach to dealing with land reform.
Information
was gathered from government departments, such as the RLCC and the DLA, on all
the land claims and existing land reform projects in the area. This information was documented, along with the
information gathered from communities.This included the plotting of all land claims on maps to develop, for the
first time, a picture of what land is affected.
It
was found that there are over sixty land claims (fifty-six just from Nzhelele)
that appear to be valid, and that these cover over 90% of land in Makhado.There are about 10 000 farm workers many of
whom live with their families on the farms.There are a few LRAD projects, although the land claims make it difficult
to go forward with a large number of redistribution projects.A few land claims have been settled with
return of land, and these experiences have highlighted the lack of a post
settlement strategy.
The
Makhado Municipality had no plan for dealing with land reform in their area.
Their IDPs had no plan for dealing with land reform in the area or even made any
mention of it.This despite the dramatic
impact the settlement of land claims is likely to have on most developments
planned within the IDP.
An integrated approach
The
information gathered confirmed the need for an integrated approach to deal with
the multiplicity of issues required for success.The potentially far reaching impact of land reform in the area also
highlights the need for a vision of the development outcome that involves quite
integrally land reform in progress.The
number of different claims and other land needs also makes it impossible for
stakeholders to co-ordinate their actions around each project, confirming the
need to try and get co-ordination at an area level.
As
part of the ALRI project Nkuzi ran a number of training workshops for municipal
councillors, officials, community leaders, community members, and other
stakeholders on issues such as livelihood concepts, development, land reform,
and planning.These aimed to raise the
level of awareness and have a common understanding of key concepts amongst the
participants in the ALRI process.
Nkuzi
facilitated workshops specifically with women and youth to address their
involvement in land reform.Several
workshops were held with women representatives from communities in the area
where issues of gender and the role of women in land reform, development and
community organising were discussed.Similar workshops were run with youth delegates.These workshops also discussed strategies for
organising women and youth to have a more prominent role within land reform
processes and structures.
After
a series of consultations, where further resource organisations such as the
local university and agricultural training college were involved, a Makhado Land
Conference was held in August 2004 to discuss the proposed approach and
solutions.The main components of the
approach being suggested were to have the government departments, community
organisations (including the land claimants) and other stakeholders
collaborating around an integrated and common approach to dealing with land and
related development issues within the Makhado area.
This
approach will require the decentralising of decision making powers and control
of resources.It will also require the
establishment of a multi-disciplinary team, initially with staff seconded or
assigned from the key departments, to implement the work at the local
level.Once a team is in place they will
need to develop a common approach to how they work, including the reorientation
of officials to put the beneficiaries of land reform at the centre of planning,
decision making and implementation.A
number of specific projects were also identified as part of the proposed
plans.These projects include: putting in
place a local team with the capacity to facilitate the acquisition and
distribution of land; ensuring access to capital for new farmers; improving
access to markets; infrastructure development; and building the capacity to
provide the required extension services.
The
Makhado Land Conference was attended by amongst others the Minister for
Agriculture and Land Affairs.The
stakeholders at the conference – including the Minister and senior DLA officials
– gave a strong endorsement for the initiative, confirming that it needs to be
taken forward with a central role for the municipality in driving the process.
Reaching an impasse
Following
the conference discussions were held with senior managers at DLA about the next
steps to implementation.A document was
drafted outlining the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders in
the initiative.There followed an impasse
in the project as those involved waited for the various government departments
to take the steps agreed to: the critical issue being to commit to the roles and
responsibilities identified and to allocate the required personnel to the
project.
Nkuzi
continued to work at the community level dealing with land issues that arose,
and supporting capacity and institution building activities.But despite this, community structures have
not taken steps to push for the implementation of the co-ordinated approach
agreed upon.
One
of the challenges that has arisen is the difficulty of getting action from
government on a new approach, despite very senior level endorsement of the
initiative.The municipality, DLA, and
the Provincial and National Departments of Agriculture have all experienced
changes at the highest management levels in the last year.However it seems there are also more general
and entrenched challenges to changing government approaches to implementation.
What is working
At
the National Land Summit held at the end of July 2005 the idea of a proactive
and integrated local area approach featured prominently in the discussions about
alternative ways of delivering land reform.This cannot of course be attributed solely to the ALRI, but the
initiative does seem to have made a contribution to the thinking and debates. It
was highlighted as a possible way forward by the Minister for Agriculture and
Land Affairs in her closing address to the Summit.
Despite
not being fully implemented, the ALRI work appears to have brought some positive
results:
Instead
of being dealt with individually, the land claims are being handled in clusters
of claims.This enables a more
developmental and co-ordinated approach and has helped to sustain organisation
amongst communities that have as a consequence been able to discuss and take
common positions on issues.
There
is an increased role now for women and youth within the land claims committees
at a community and forum level.
The
compilation of the information on land claims has clearly illustrated that a
developmental approach is needed and that a narrow project approach simply
cannot succeed.
The
municipality is playing a more active role in land reform pr ocesses within the
area.
Moving forward
Nkuzi
recently arranged a multi-stakeholder workshop to review the status of the
initiative and what can be done to move forward.The organisations present – that ranged from the DLA and the premier's
office, to the LPM and local chamber of commerce – committed to taking the
initiative forward.However it is still
clear that there is a significant institutional inertia that makes it very
difficult for government departments to shift approach, and Nkuzi has realised
that they will have to continue to push for action even if commitments are made
from others.It is also clear that
communities need to mobilise to hold government accountable for commitments
made, but they will need better levels of organisation and improved strategies
to be able to do this effectively.
The
Makhado Municipality is now writing to the Director Generals of Agriculture and
Land Affairs to request that the initiative be formally endorsed as a pilot, and
that resources including staff are allocated to take it forward.
Nkuzi
is working to better document the experience and lessons from the initiative so
far.They will also produce manuals for
the facilitation of such a process, and for the work to be carried out by the
various government officials.Clear
implementation guidelines are needed if officials are to shift from their
current mode of operation.
Despite
the challenges experienced, this and other initiatives that are trying to find
and test alternative implementation strategies for land reform need to be
supported.
Marc Wegerif
works with the Nkuzi Development Association, a collegial organisation to
AFRA.
Lessons
from Gongolo & Makhado
The
beneficiaries
of land reform must be at the centre of planning, decision making and
implementation. If land reform is to be successful, the rural poor need to
become drivers of the process. Projects need to be shaped by the needs of the
rural poor and build on their skills and resources.This means that a concerted effort
on the part of government departments and municipalities needs to be made to
break the "silos" in which they work, in order to challenge the resulting
inertia of integrated development initiatives.
It is important to include municipalities in the process for a land
claim. Often land reform projects are not properly incorporated into a
municipality’s development vision, where in fact municipalities need to be drivers of local
development.Including a municipality
provides an opportunity for it to ensure that discussions on solutions that are
sustainable in terms of its municipal mandate are developed.It provides a better base for the municipality
to see to it that the people in its area are able to access development and are
serviced in terms of their constitutional obligation. Further, it affords the
municipality the latitude to plan communally with the RLCC, PLRO and other
stakeholders regarding development and an improved understanding of land
reform.Focus needs to be put on creating
an environment that will enable the transfer of land and successful land use
within a broader development strategy.
There is value in bringing
together all stakeholders with varied interests and objectives to agree on
an integrated and common approach or process to land development within an area.
This is an insurmountable task but it challenges stakeholders to listen to and
learn from each other.
Bringing all stakeholders together also provides much greater opportunity
for in-depth consultation with affected
communities.
Communities need to mobilise
to hold government accountable for commitments made, but they themselves need to
be more organised to do this.
It is important to understand and respect people's sense of
community and to cultivate a sense of municipal community by taking all
municipal citizen's concerns equally seriously. It is important to avoid an
unnecessary dividing of the community.Restoration of farms is different from restoration of land as people see
it in terms of traditional wards they lost.People who put in claims as well as those who did not for various reasons
are part of the same communities and are equally entitled to
development.
"The information gathered confirmed
the need for an integrated approach to deal with the multiplicity of issues
required for
success"
"Instead of being dealt with
individually, the land claims are being handled in clusters of claims. This
enables a more developmental and co-ordinated
approach..."